Blathering Blatherskite

January 7, 2025

Before I launch into today’s news, a definition:

blatherskite
ˈbla-t͟hər-ˌskīt
noun
1. a person who blathers a lot
2. nonsense, blather

Merriam-Webster.com

POTUS-elect Pounces on Panama, Expounds on Expansion

In a press conference earlier today from his Mar-a-Lago resort, President-elect Donald Trump spoke about quite a range of issues. The biggest newsmakers of the bunch, though, weren’t so much about “making America great again” — but more making it bigger. This included retaking control of the Panama Canal and buying Greenland. He declined to rule out military or economic actions as methods. He also wants to “get rid of that artificially drawn line” between the United States and Canada, and rename the Gulf of Mexico to the “Gulf of America”. (It should be noted that the leaders of Panama, Denmark, and Canada have all stated emphatically what Trump can do with his expansionistic desires. I’d anticipate a similar response from Mexico.)

LINK

Ups and Downs for Trump’s Legal Cases

In other Trump news, a New York appellate court today denied his bid to halt sentencing set for Friday for his conviction in the porn star hush money case. This is after the judge overseeing the case, Juan Merchan, rejected a request for delay yesterday. Merchan gave a potential preview of his sentence by stating that he was not inclined to send the 34-count-felon to prison, but was looking favorably at a sentence of “unconditional discharge”, which means Trump would be a guilty felon, but would not owe any fines, probation, or prison time.

LINK

Also today, Judge Aileen Cannon blocked Special Counsel Jack Smith from releasing a report on his investigations into Trump’s mishandling of classified documents and attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. The U.S. District Judge — who was put on the bench by Trump during his first term, and has since done everything she could to delay and dismiss the case — directed the Justice Department not to release the report until after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit rules whether or not Smith’s appointment as Special Counsel was legal.

LINK

Meta: Who Needs Fact-Checking?

Facebook parent company Meta announced today that it would be ending its fact-checking program, and bring back more political content to its platforms. As part of this and other moderation reforms happening across Facebook, Instagram, and Threads, Meta would be ending restrictions on topics like immigration and gender, and reducing oversight of topics like general oversight, except on topics like1 terrorism, child sexual exploitation, drugs, fraud, and scams.

It should be noted that the fact check program was put in place in response to massive amounts of misinformation that was published on its platforms following the 2016 U.S. election, and had massively expanded leading into 2020. However, those efforts were frowned upon by right-wing activists who claimed that preventing them from spreading their misinformation was politicized censorship.

LINK

Clip art of many silhouetted people, in multiple colors, talking
  1. Correction posted on 2025-01-08 ↩︎

Discover more from Zoidland!

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


Comments

One response to “Blathering Blatherskite”

  1. Independent Thinker Avatar
    Independent Thinker

    From the article you linked,

    “It will also adjust filters scanning for policy violations to only tackle illegal and ‘high severity’ violations. Those include topics like terrorism, child sexual exploitation, drugs, fraud and scams, per a Tuesday release”

    This appears to be at odds with your phrasing, “and reducing oversight of topics like terrorism, child sexual exploitation, drugs, fraud, and scams.”

    Given their focus on addressing illegal and “high severity” activity, I support this move. Facebook, as a private platform, has every right to moderate its content as it sees fit, but this shift away from broader censorship is a welcome change. It’s particularly important in light of recent revelations about government influence over content moderation, which raised serious concerns about the intersection of free speech and private platform policies.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *